Sunday was all about riding whips.
There was a sub who came all the way to meet me. Thanks a bunch.
As it's mentioned in the blog title, what does hardcore mean in the real world?
I have pointed out the perceptual difference on hard and soft in another blog entry before.
In this recent session, I was able to feel that difference very clearly and started thinking of how to go hardcore without leaving nasty marks.
For example, a sub might love some whipping.
However, he absolutely rejects the use of prickly objects (if you know what I mean) and cannot have marks on his body.
So what are the alternatives?
Should I penetrate from behind while I tie him up, burn with a hairdryer, and do water torture on him like I did before?
Or should I electrocute and tease him with toys to the extreme so he could see heaven and hell at the same time?
Hardcore doesn't always require severe physical pain.
I will have to level my approach with the recipient's imagination of pain and how much the individual can actually endure.
(I often see those that had their anus destroyed and still suffer from the wound.
It seems that there was no consent to such destructive action so I wonder.
Here, I feel the difficulty of drawing the lines)
I have to say, a session that involves bleeding is a challenge for both sides when it is our
first time to meet even if a sub wishes such session.
It's a matter of trust.
I would like to ask everyone, including dominatricis and submissives.
How do you define hardcore BDSM in real life?
Nikki
There was a sub who came all the way to meet me. Thanks a bunch.
As it's mentioned in the blog title, what does hardcore mean in the real world?
I have pointed out the perceptual difference on hard and soft in another blog entry before.
In this recent session, I was able to feel that difference very clearly and started thinking of how to go hardcore without leaving nasty marks.
For example, a sub might love some whipping.
However, he absolutely rejects the use of prickly objects (if you know what I mean) and cannot have marks on his body.
So what are the alternatives?
Should I penetrate from behind while I tie him up, burn with a hairdryer, and do water torture on him like I did before?
Or should I electrocute and tease him with toys to the extreme so he could see heaven and hell at the same time?
Hardcore doesn't always require severe physical pain.
I will have to level my approach with the recipient's imagination of pain and how much the individual can actually endure.
(I often see those that had their anus destroyed and still suffer from the wound.
It seems that there was no consent to such destructive action so I wonder.
Here, I feel the difficulty of drawing the lines)
I have to say, a session that involves bleeding is a challenge for both sides when it is our
first time to meet even if a sub wishes such session.
It's a matter of trust.
I would like to ask everyone, including dominatricis and submissives.
How do you define hardcore BDSM in real life?
Nikki